52
protecting her. It may be added that the regulations
which have been drafted require that any intended removal
of a mui tsai from the Colony, whether temporarily or
permanently, must be reported.
4.
Section 3 of this Ordinance repeals sections 7 and 8
of the principal Ordinance. Section 7 was inserted in the
principal Ordinance in its passage through the Legislative
Council. It provided that in every prosecution for
over-work or ill-treatment of a mui tsai medical evidence
shall be given as to the injuries received by the mui tsai,
that the magistrate must find whether such ill-treatment
amounted to gross cruelty, and that if the magistrate
found gross cruelty the offender must be sentenced to
imprisonment without the option of a fine. The object was
the laudable one that cases of gross cruelty should be
adequately punished. There were, however, two dangers.
One was that even gross cruelty may leave no indications
to which a medical witness can point, especially after the
lapse of days, and the medical evidence in such a case
might even have the effect of weakening the evidence of
A more serious danger was that inadvertent
gross cruelty.
failure to call
medical evidence on a charge under
section 6 of the principal Ordinance might have led to
the quashing of a conviction.
It was even possible
that if the charge were one of common assault, and
medical evidence were not called, the conviction might
have been attacked on the ground that section 7 of
the principal Ordinance would apply to a charge of common
assault on a mui tsai as well as to a charge expressly laid
under section 6.
Section 7 is therefore repealed.
Some of its provisions are reproduced in the new section
Page 50Page 51
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.